Initial equality impact assessment screening form This form records an equality screening process to determine the relevance of equality to a proposal, and a decision whether or not a full EIA would be appropriate or proportionate.
Directorate	Central Services
Service area	Resources - Finance
Proposal being screened	The distribution of the national insurance employer contribution costs and 2025 pay award costs elements of the core school budget grant (CSBG) to special schools and alternative provision schools for the 2025-2026 financial year
Officer(s) carrying out screening	Sally Dunn
What are you proposing to do?	North Yorkshire Council proposes to distribute the National Insurance Employer Contribution Costs and 2025 Pay Award Costs elements of the Core Schools Budget Grant (CSBG) funding to local authority maintained Special Schools and Alternative Provision and Special and Alternative Provision Academies based on the Department for Education (DfE) methodology used to distribute the funding to local authorities for the 2025-2026 financial year.
Why are you proposing this? What are the desired outcomes?	To comply with the DfE grant conditions for the distribution of the CSBG funding.
Does the proposal involve a significant commitment or removal of resources? Please give details.	No. The funding allocations will be contained within the ringfenced CSBG funding for the 2025/26 financial year.
Impact on people with any of the following protected characteristics as defined by the Equality Act 2010, or NYC’s additional agreed characteristics As part of this assessment, please consider the following questions: · To what extent is this service used by particular groups of people with protected characteristics? · Does the proposal relate to functions that previous consultation has identified as important? · Do different groups have different needs or experiences in the area the proposal relates to? If for any characteristic it is considered that there is likely to be an adverse impact or you have ticked ‘Don’t know/no info available’, then a full EIA should be carried out where this is proportionate. You are advised to speak to your directorate representative for advice if you are in any doubt.
Protected characteristic		Potential for adverse impact				Don’t know/No info available
		Yes		No
Age				x
Disability				x
Sex				x
Race				x
Sexual orientation				x
Gender reassignment				x
Religion or belief				x
Pregnancy or maternity				x
Marriage or civil partnership				x
People in rural areas				x
People on a low income				x
Carer (unpaid family or friend)				x
Are from the Armed Forces Community				x
Does the proposal relate to an area where there are known inequalities/probable impacts (for example, disabled people’s access to public transport)? Please give details.		No
Will the proposal have a significant effect on how other organisations operate? (for example, partners, funding criteria, etc.). Do any of these organisations support people with protected characteristics? Please explain why you have reached this conclusion.		The proposal is providing additional funding to special schools and alternative provision that support children and young people with SEND. The additional funding is provided by the DfE to support the establishments in meeting the additional costs of the increase in employers’ national insurance contributions from April 2025 and pay awards in the 2025-26 financial year.
Decision (Please tick one option)		EIA not relevant or proportionate:	ü		Continue to full EIA:
Reason for decision		No adverse impact has been identified on people with protected characteristics as defined by the Equality Act 2010, or NYC’s additional agreed characteristics.
Signed (Assistant Director or equivalent)
Date